On August 23, 2018, the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint for injunctive and other relief
against 1 Global Capital, LLC (“1st Global Capital”) in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida alleging, among other
things, that 1st Global Capital “fraudulently raised more than $287
million from more than 3,400 investors.” And as 1st Global Capital filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, it’s unlikely the victims of this fraud
will recover more than a fraction of their money from 1st Global
Finance. But all may not be lost if you are such a victim of this fraud and if you
purchased your investment in Missouri.
Another avenue of recovery may be against the sales agents that brokered
these investments to you in Missouri on behalf of 1st Global
Capital.
1st Global Capital sourced its capital
through a “network of barred brokers, registered and unregistered investment
advisers, and other sales agents – to whom they paid millions in commissions –
to offer and sell unregistered securities to investors in no fewer than 25
states” according the complaint filed by the SEC. Missouri was one of those
states. And, these brokers, investment advisers and sales agents who brokered
these sales in Missouri may be liable to these investors in Missouri for the
following reasons:
First, these investments in the forms of a
“9-month Promissory Note,” “Memorandum of Indebtedness” or “Loan Agreement”
from 1st Global Capital constitute “securities” within the meaning
of Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. § 77b(a)(1)] (the
“Securities Act”). As such, they were
required to be registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act or
exempted from registration therefrom. No such registration statement was filed
and no exemption from registration existed for the 1st Global
Capital securities. So, under federal and state law, including the Securities
Act, you may be able to bring a private right of action against the sellers of
these securities for the recovery of your investment.
Second, because the brokers, investment advisers
and sales agents who brokered these
securities in Missouri are governed by the rulings of the Eighth U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals, the definition of what constitutes a “seller” of securities
under the Securities Act is not limited to the person who actually passes title of the securities to the
purchaser. This definition has been broadened to include the intermediary who facilitated the sale of
the security to the purchaser, if that intermediary was made aware of
questionable circumstances surrounding the transaction and “was uniquely
positioned to ask relevant questions, acquire additional information, or
disclose his findings” to the purchaser. Wasson
v. SEC, 558 F.2d 879, 886 (8th Cir. 1977). Moreover, a different
panel of the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the “substantial
factor” test, in which a person “whose participation in the buy-sell
transaction [was] a ‘substantial factor’ in causing the transaction to take
place” was held to be a seller under the Securities Act. Stokes v. Lokken, 644 F. 2d 779, 785 (8th Cir. 1981).
If you purchased 1st Global Capital
securities in Missouri, then there are laws that could provide you with the
right to recover from the broker, investment adviser or sales agent who
brokered that investment to you, including the Securities Act, the Missouri
Uniform Securities Act, §§409.1.1,
et seq., RSMo. (2016), and the Missouri common law. These laws could entitle
you to recover the money paid for the securities, with interests and costs, and
in some cases your reasonable attorneys’ fees and punitive damages.
Author: Brian St. James
No comments:
Post a Comment