Social media such as Facebook,
Twitter, LinkedIn, or blogs have become popular mechanisms for companies to
communicate with the public. Social media allows companies to communicate with
clients and prospective clients, market their services, educate the public
about their products, and recruit employees. Social media converts a static
medium, such as a website, where viewers passively receive content, into a
medium where users actively create content. However, this type of interaction
poses certain risks for investment advisers and this topic has been a hot
button for securities regulators.
The SEC previously issued a National
Examination Risk Alert on investment adviser use of social media. As a
registered investment adviser, use of social media by a firm and/or related
persons of a firm must comply with applicable provisions of the federal
securities laws, including the laws and regulations under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). The Risk Alert noted that the various
laws and regulations most affected by social media are anti-fraud provision,
including advertising, compliance provisions, and recordkeeping provisions. Advisers
Act Rule 206(4)-7 requires firms to create and implement social media policies,
and periodically review the policy’s effectiveness.
Anti-fraud provisions with respect
to advertising are probably most affected by the use of social media. All
social media use and communications must comply with Rule 206(4)-1. While advertising
policies should already be included in a firm’s compliance manual, such
policies may not be sufficient enough to address some of the concerns with advertising
in the context of social media. Establishing a specific policy to address
social media may be prudent.
The area of advertising that has
caused the most confusion is the prohibition on the use of testimonials. The
SEC has previously defined testimonial to include a statement of a client’s
experience with, or endorsement of, any investment adviser. Firms and IARs must
ensure that third-party comments on their social media sites do not constitute
a testimonial. Furthermore, the SEC vaguely discussed whether the popular
“like” function on many social media sites would be deemed a testimonial:
[T]he staff believes
that, depending on the facts and circumstances, the use of “social plug-ins”
such as the “like” button could be a testimonial under the Advisers Act.
Third-party use of the “like” feature on an investment adviser’s social media
site could be deemed to be a testimonial if it is an explicit or implicit
statement of a client's or clients' experience with an investment adviser or
IAR. If, for example, the public is invited to “like” an IAR’s biography posted
on a social media site, that election could be viewed as a type of testimonial
prohibited by rule 206(4)-1(a)(1).
The types of policies that firms
must create concerning advertising and testimonials depend greatly on the
function of a specific website. For instance, approving the firm or IARs use of
certain websites may turn on whether that website allows for review and
approval of third-party comments before such comments are posted on the site or
whether the “like” function can be disabled. A firm’s monitoring capabilities
and the latitude it wants to provide employees with respect to personal use of
social media cannot be ignored either.
The SEC has outlined various
factors that should be considered by an investment adviser when evaluating the
effective of their compliance program. These factors are:
- Usage and content guidelines and restrictions on IAR use of social media whether on behalf of the firm or for personal use
- Mechanisms for approval of social media use and content;
- Monitoring of social media use by the firm and IARs and the frequency of monitoring;
- Consideration of the function or risk exposure of specific social media sites;
- Establishing training and requiring IAR certification;
- Whether access to social media poses information security risks; and
- Firm resources that can be dedicated to implementation of social media policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment